My kid isn't allowed to live in the house that I am paying rent for is a hard pill to swallow.I am just chalking it up to the unique situation I we are in as a nation.  

Now is not the time to insult tenants further I had a good friend become addicted to prescription meds.

If this is a small slice of property that hasn't been used by the claimant or his predecessors for 30 years, then a lawsuit against you is unlikely.But if you are sued, then based on what you've posted, you have a valid (legally cognizable) defense.  30 years of continuous use of the property by you and your predecessors constitutes (Adverse Possession and/or Prescriptive Easement). 

At CA prices, that’s a hefty pill to swallow and limits my scale ability.

In my experience those programs are more comparable with the coaches on "the biggest loser" than being a purchased magic pill that suddenly makes all the changes, so either way it's gotta be you who does it, only question is if on your own or with an expensive coach chasing behind cracking a whip on ya to keep you moving forward at it. 

Comments often vary widely as design is not always prescriptive and different interpretations of the code exist.

I inform our new tenant that she was required to provide a prescription for the dog or the dog must be removed from the property.   

I am hooked on Bigger pocket's blue pill and will post progress. 

I would request a letter from an actual local mental health professional that you can call to verify the ESA prescription, and refuse to accept any online forms they may have paid $20 to download from a fake mental health professional.

The term for gaining an easement by repeated use is a prescriptive easement.