They have been good tenants so far and seem like gentle, nice people.

Here is a different twist on the topic, I posted this some time ago on my blog. 

Perhaps there's another more gentle and righteous side to him, but the behavior he exhibited on TV in front of millions of people reflects a serious flaw in his character...one that won't likely be easy to overcome in court.

Not to mention your math doesn't add up, you keep twisting is misconstruing things, reinforcing it's all just a TROLLING action. 

You do a slow twisting motion until it sits down nice and snug.

Now there's a twist.

Eddie, please allow me to point out, very gently, that if a tenant moves into a place with brand new paint and brand new carpet and within 3 years both paint and carpet are ruined, that tenant is NOT the kind that a landlord would love to have.Yes, you have to replace the carpet and repaint when they move out.

Like I can really tell what to type since they all look the same when they're twisted and distorted ala Edvard Munch.

Daniel, great point, this really places a twist on the whole transaction, 203k is not going to be a great avenue on the surface level, it is really designated for owner-occupant, now with that out of the way.  

This is a far-cry from my usual sleeping in, hanging at the beach, and only thinking about my properties if my property manager emails me about something.Not sure the point in my post, other than to make the announcement that my usual preaching of cash flow outside of California has a twist in the plot now.