hmmm, I've looked into a credit card line company, they line you up with 0% credit card lines (which have a 4% origination fee ) and they want a $6,000 fee once you get 50K at 0% for 6 months, the fee pays for their "proprietary" system which finds an zeros in on 0% credit card offers, which you may or may not be capable of googling "0% credit card offers" (Yes I'm being sarcastic)I haven't pulled the trigger on their offer, it's not completely unreasonable, I just haven't needed the money that bad yet to expose myself to the fees and the realization that 0% offers expire after a period, could be 3,6 or 12 months and jump up to 10% to 29% ( or more) rates.

Contact a contractor, ask if covering it would be okay - - these guys known the codes and asking one, two or three of them would not expose you to City interference.

In litigation without isolation, your personal assets and possessions are fully exposed at all times.

Now that we've discussed some potential ways a landlord can be exposed from a liability standpoint, let's discuss a few simple ways to mitigate that exposure as much as possible.   

At least I know he has been exposed to the broader concepts of real estate options. 

If he's been exposed as a possible fraud why is he still allowed on Bp?

Does that expose me to similar risks? 

It's not a trick question - I just haven't been exposed to a case like that.

If your company is not named on the COI, it could potentially leave you exposed to risk, should something happen.

I consider myself financially secure but a bit too exposed to the stock market.