With x number of hours in, and time to contemplate what life will be like with the transaction concluded, the other party is more willing to concede points, accept a less favorable outcome, and provide greater advantage to you.The other thought is to QUICKLY separate the “real” deals from the overwhelming majority of buyers, sellers, borrowers, lenders, etc who MAY do a deal IF and only if they are getting the deal of the century.  

With that information I can tell you EXACTLY who the best lender is because it will be one that accepts you as the borrower, the property type, the purpose for the loan while give you the most aggresive rates and terms.Feel free to reach out to discuss.

Rule of thumb: If they SOUND LIKE a "better buy now, before the door closes" artificial scarcity model peddler, then better take it for a click tunnel "test drive," and ALWAYS maintain defacto "veto power," via potential charge- back!!! 

That smacks of distrust or micro-management.I have this discussion with my owners before I accept the job.

I look at each deal for the win/win test, as I am not out to loan money for a lousy deal and put the investor under a financial burden.

I would stick to my normal business practices as opposed to accepting bribes to house unqualified applicants.

The borello law & the ABC test are killing gig workers and the EDD is auditioning them at a voraciously pace.

My primary goal is long term appreciation and I'll accept a property that breaks even on cash flow.

That they could accept this or I could press for damages and that they could do the same if needed.

This is one of the main reasons that many people decide to “test the waters” before devoting themselves full time as a new agent.