
10 October 2016 | 11 replies
After 5-7 years the owner will make $250-300k just in interest, then when I refinance or sell (if I could) they would be making about $1.1-$1.2m on the transaction once the remaining principal is paid to them.

10 October 2016 | 30 replies
I'm looking at this, forstarters, from a tax point of view: if you have a mortgage then you can deduct "that" (= the non-principal components) from your rental income.

11 October 2016 | 10 replies
Meanwhile we'll rehab and sell as many houses as possible each year to use for down payments and also to pay down the mortgage principals.

16 January 2016 | 2 replies
A very kind investor on BP enlightened me about the opportunity i would lose by not investing that extra cash i was dumping into my principal.

17 January 2016 | 22 replies
They claim that the wholesalers are not real buyers, only closing if they FIND the real buyer, therefore they are in effect selling the property on behalf of the seller.The wholesaler's argument is that they are PRINCIPALS in the transaction, exercising their right to withdraw from the contract if contingencies are not met, or by exercising the purchase option often now included in purchase contracts.

16 January 2016 | 1 reply
In fact, it will increase your taxes by lowering your interest deductions as you pay down principal and reduce interest charges.

8 May 2019 | 9 replies
I've sold quite a few rentals by owner, but on principal, not to save commissions.I would recommend having your lead paint (if pre 1978) and condition disclosures filled out and at the ready.

21 November 2015 | 1 reply
I certainly did not, and neither did the mortgage lender who pre-qualified me.After closing on the HELOC this week, I was reading through the docs last night and stumbled upon the Occupancy clause :"Borrower shall occupy, establish, and use the Property as Borrower's principal residence within 60 days after the execution of this Security Instrument and shall continue to occupy the Property as Borrower's principal residence for at least one year after the date of occupancy, unless Lender otherwise agrees in writing, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, or unless extenuating circumstances exist which are beyond Borrower's control"So I'm not sure what to do.
24 November 2015 | 8 replies
Then later you will be putting in quite a bit of cash if it needs all the things you say.The only benefit to holding would be the monthly equity buildup thru principal reduction on your mortgage, which is a slow, (and some depreciation) but fairly sure way to amass equity, a free house in 15 to 30 years is a great thing., but 30 years is a long time...however you have to be prepared for the possibility that the rents could go down and not cover the mortgage (not too likely in my opinion) or the vacancy factor could go up and you again may not be able to cover the mortgage.Lastly if we have another crash in values and it goes down under what you owe then your $35k equity could disappear.These scenarios could cause you to end up giving it back to the bank and ruin you credit thru no fault of your own.

25 November 2015 | 6 replies
Question is this:Lets say that a homeowner bought his house in 1990 for $200,000 and he kept paying on it until his principal was cut in half, right at $100,000 by January 2015.