If it will be owner-occupied, there are a number of compliance issues to ensure you address (Dodd-Frank, etc). 

Why would I not choose to leverage at 6 or 7% (my current lock is at 6.385%)https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/san-diego/real-estatemy long time stance that the RE should be judged on total return use to be very unpopular view on this site that viewed cash flow as sure and superior and appreciation to be gambling.  

By utilizing one provider for both services, both can be aligned, customized to your portfolio’s needs which should achieve a better outcome overall.Real estate investing can be very complex and navigating taxes, compliance and insurance can be overwhelming and complex, deterring some people from expanding their portfolio or from investing at all.

Consulting with a tax professional is advised to ensure compliance and proper handling of deadlines.This post does not create a CPA-Client relationship.

I'm a licenced Broker and I also handle project management for flippers, contractors, etc.FEMA 50% Rule: ALL of the homes that exist in a Flood Zone have a 50% limit on work that can be done to repair them without bringing them into compliance with current flood standards.

Review your loan agreement for restrictions, and consult legal and tax professionals to ensure compliance and protect your interests.In C State, you can elect to file MMLLC as disregarded entity for tax reasons.

At today’s rates, most properties at high LTV are negative even with 1% rent to value ratio   This implies the 1% rule is far from assuring positive cash flow   Good luck

@George JanIn my opinion, there isn't as much regulatory compliance or liability with something like a municipal bond.

I do feel they need to be better at communicating assurance in fiscal solvency to their LPs, but at any given moment they could theoretically pause infilling, and pay the pref distributions.

This setup ensures that I stay in compliance with California’s FTB requirements.