
12 November 2014 | 12 replies
In the lease it states "Quiet Enjoyment" I took this to mean that no disruptive behavior and such, but on further research, it is interpreted as landlord not "bothering" tenant.

10 November 2014 | 1 reply
I dont understand. I put my days holding this at 150 days. So that should have calculated in the mortgage payment for that number of days. What is confusing me is the variance in days posted to the side. Any c...

30 November 2014 | 24 replies
I believe your lease could be interpreted two ways.

11 November 2017 | 14 replies
Mike, what caught my eye was the "can't see how the state can" point is, the state can regardless of a person's political views or how they interpret the constitution or define freedom or justify their thinking, the state can and does, either comply or suffer like everyone else.

6 October 2014 | 24 replies
Interpret Loan Limits 79.

1 October 2015 | 4 replies
A lot of times trustees will conduct their sale at the same time and place in hopes of getting additional bids on the properties they are selling.Other states hold their sales in accordance with their laws, and how they are interpreted by that counties attorneys.
1 October 2014 | 11 replies
Their interpretation is specifically discussed in a memo named the Keating Memo.

11 November 2014 | 11 replies
thanks for your help :) Joshua:If you go searching the CRA website for the ITBs and interpretations around Purchase Options / Lease Options and Instalment Sales, you will find they're not fans of the term "Rent-to-Own" and it often serves as a flag for "instalment sale".The CRA interpretations are similar to what Bill Gulley and others have written on BP with respect to safe/correct practices in the U.S.A., though perhaps not quite as strict.

18 July 2017 | 51 replies
And, the vital thing to remember is that Dodd-Frank is still being interpreted.

28 November 2014 | 25 replies
All my comments are in reference to CaliforniaI found this in a law book online:---------------------------------The right of the broker in California to complete standard form contracts of sale is not established by the case law, but one commentator has suggested that it may be inferred from the interpretation of regulatory statutes governing the definition and examination requirements of real estate brokers.