That only seems to indicate loud noises disturbing other tenants would fall under that definition. 

I’ve been debating giving this a try but the overwhelming response to avoid is disturbing. 

The reasoning to not allowing to see the inside until an offer is accepted is to not disturb the current tenants and make them unhappy.

It's the hyper-inflationary scenario and huge economic dislocation, with high unemployment, that is most disturbing.

Depending on what'sin your lease, if they are disturbing the neighbors, regardless of paying rent on time, AND they discharged a firearm inside the premises, accidental or not, I would proceed with the eviction.

We'd like to amend the agreements - if we can - to add a 3-strikes rule for any disturbances.

To discourage lookie-loos and minimize the disturbance to the tenants. 

If you have lots of domestic disturbance, petty theft, battery, etc. that is not the same level as forcable entry, theft of car, armed robbery,drugs, rape,murder,etc.Look around at the other buildings.

What's disturbing is that I never got a landlord reference call about her, or another tenant that was evicted, or one that left thousands of dollars in damage after moving out.

You plan to meet the person outside and will be completing everything outside, but will only be there for 15 min and not disturb them.