Here’s my dilemmas:- it was my primary residence until 2020.

Now that "job" is just a trade of time for health insurance, PTO, and a vehicle for retirement.I see many people, after 30 years of working, find themselves looking forward to an "easier" time enjoying what they built.

It's sick and twisted.I would just like to have the government house those who are forever homeless AWAY from the towns, out in the country paid for by the taxpayers for the benefit of the taxpayers.Giving them a 'Hand Up" works for the short-term homeless people (those who have experienced some misfortune but can get back to normal with some help) but it seems like a large swath of them need to be "cared for" indoors by the government.If that is sick, twisted or smug, then so be it, but living outdoors on city streets will not cure their drug behavior or their mental illness either.There are two separate issues here:[1] "America" has a homeless problem.[2] The Homeless have drug problems and mental health issues.I am focusing on issue [1], you are focusing on issue [2].Just my 2 cents.

. * Government actions to forestall distressed home sales will begin to fade when the economy returns to full health.

However you can get CPS and the health department involved. 

It's way more beneficial to my business, mental health, and time to find a great agent that's a part of my team instead. 

This is a health code violation.

I’m a brand new investor, no deals, don’t even own my own home yet, just starting my journey via books, podcasts, forums, YouTube etc… Here’s my dilemma: I have a little over 100k saved.

My dilemma is, do I just sell and take the $100,000 now and put it in like an S&P 500 Index Fund or keep the property and take the $265/Month to maybe $465/Month Free Cash Flow – after all costs - and take advantage of all the tax deductions and depreciation, while the renters are paying off the property slowly.

It also means I can keep my income bracket low, and qualify for health insurance subsidies.