I do have a son-in-law who recently invested in a laundromat in Phil. 

Check your local laws, you may be required to consider vouchers.

On another note, you have some fairly restrictive laws regarding private lending, consumer protection (seller financing to an owner occupant) and loan servicing in CA state so make sure you are allowed to do this on your own and understand the licensure requirements to lend, broker loans, and service them as well.

There’s no privacy advantage any more with the new federal registration law, there’s no tax advantage, and there’s probably no liability advantage.

You are not “treating everyone equally” as required by law.

Laws here are being increasingly restrictive.

But everyone basically signed those agreements late into the search right before an offer was made, and because the seller almost always paid, it wasn’t the traditional negotiation you’d have upfront with a seller, 2ndly while I do think this is a net win for the consumer, the idea that the doj “solved a problem that didn’t exist” 1st of all it wasn’t doj it was a jury in Missouri 2ndly the issue is regardless of impact on consumer’s they were almost certainly violating anti-trust law which is illegal lol, the publishing of commissions and the fact that something like 98% of all agents were paid between 2.5-3% was textbook, imagine if the price for a ritz and a motel 6 we’re basically the same, you’d think collusion right? 

Everybody, the law has changed dramatically about tax lien foreclosures in Alabama.

Unless local laws say otherwise: Notify both of them that the lease is not being renewed.

Other than paying the lump sum...Laws regarding real estate are state specific.