suggesting a 12.5% offer , implies that they know the business.

The listing broker also provides assurances that the EMD has been collected, by showing the check, it is implied that the broker has the funds.

If they had a 6 month lease and didn't ask for an extension, isn't it implied that they are leaving?

It seems to originate from Vena Jones-Cox.I have seen several highly respected speakers and trainers like Vena post concerns on the web regarding House Bill 1787, rallying everyone to stop this bill, reporting that if it passes the US Senate then it's Armageddon for creative real estate investors.

It seems to originate from Vena Jones-Cox.I have seen several highly respected speakers and trainers like Vena post concerns on the web regarding House Bill 1787, rallying everyone to stop this bill, reporting that if it passes the US Senate then it's Armageddon for creative real estate investors.

It seems to originate from Vena Jones-Cox.I have seen several highly respected speakers and trainers like Vena post concerns on the web regarding House Bill 1787, rallying everyone to stop this bill, reporting that if it passes the US Senate then it's Armageddon for creative real estate investors.

Ironically, the American bulldog bit me when I was trying to protect a pit bull that she attacked.I know dog trainers who work with many different breeds, including pit bulls, and I have never felt threatened by any of their pit bulls.

For example, let's say one purchases a property with the following characteristics: pp=120K, NOI=12K, DS=10K, and dp=12K (which implies a loan at 90% LTV).cap rate = 12K/120K = .1DCR = 12K/10K = 1.2ptcf = 12K-10K = 2KROI = ptcf/dp = 2K/12K = .167Notice how the purchase price, NOI, and cap rate are the same in both examples; yet, the ROI differs.

The tenant already implied that he think that Stephen has "Lots of money" , Therefore, Stephen can use the image of "Lots of money that can buy lots of lawyer who can make the tenant life miserable" If keeping the house intact for sale is the upmost goal here, then let it go and try to get the compensation through the sale.

Assuing the same 4% appreciation results in an IRR of 14.65%, which is quite good.Unfortunately, that implies rents on this unit are $3000 in 30 years.