We have a lot of investors leaving the Cleveland area and coming to Toledo because of code compliance and difficulty with management companies.

Each option has its pros and cons, and I'm hoping to get some insights from this community to make a more informed decision.Option 1: Building an ADUPros:Increased Property Value: An ADU can significantly increase the value of my primary residence.Control and Proximity: I can closely manage and maintain the property since it's on my land.Potential for Higher Rent: ADUs in bay area can fetch a good rental price.Flexible Use: ADUs can serve multiple purposes – home office, guest house, or rental unit.No Additional Land Purchase: Utilizing existing property means no extra cost for land acquisition.Foundation improvements: I will get an upgrade for my foundation which increase house stability.

In Dallas Metroplex I am constantly finding good deals in Fort Worth.I wouldn't recommended to add extra cash every month to pay for the mortgage.

You are oversimplifying the difficulty of doing what you say you want to do.

[That's an extra $18K a month we didn't anticipate which really helps to offset those extra operating costs.]

The reality is the opposite - if it's not in writing then the PMC doesn't have to provide the service or can charge extra for it!

What difficulties may I face to get rid of the tenants ?

The option money will stay with the seller and the extra monthly amount paid will go to whomever specified in the contract (usually the seller). 5.

Cash flow is hard to come by in the Boulder / Denver markets and although the extra monthly cash flow would be great, and there's plenty of places in Iowa that will cash flow, I'm wanting to scale quickly and feel Colorado would be a decent place for that. 

Ellis :) but I've seen extra living units (units that exceed the zoning) ordered to be torn down and in over 30 years of investing in the Columbus market I've NEVER seen them tolerated.