If someone is trying to do business with others and is unwilling to publicly share their name or other pertinent information, then why should you take them seriously.People don't deal with imaginary figures.

It is not that I am unwilling to attend the meeting it is the fact I am unwilling to pay to attend the meeting.

My impression is that lenders are unwilling to deal unless a house has been on the market a long time.

If its not a great deal, the bank is unwilling to come down.

If they were unwilling, I would have inspected the property in detail, deducted any charges for repairs, done the repairs and returned the partial deposit.

Not necessarily a bad thing, because you'll be able to tell him how things are going to work, instead of being stuck with an old dog unwilling to learn any new tricks.

As the banks have probably realized large losses, they sometimes are unwilling to expend any time or money, and further liability.

The homeowner is unwilling to do a lease/purchase.I'm looking for a solution now because I do not think that this particular house will remain on the market for very long.

The problem is that most brokers are unwilling to go the extra steps to ensure that they have lease option documentation that satisfies state requirements for their agents...thus mitigating the risks and making sure that these deals will still be covered by their insurance carriers.

Theoretically this can be done in one swift action, however, title companies are more and more unwilling to partake in anything but the most straight forward transactions.While most real estate buyers will demand title insurance, I, like many other experienced investors, have sold property directly to buyers without title insurance or title companies involved.