However, many of the issues that the City believes are a problem are created by the tenants, and the landlords do not have the authority to fix them.Here is some sample language related to tenants in the proposed ordinance:Tenant Behavior Ultimately, it is the landlord’s responsibility to police their tenants, whether through stipulations in the lease or other means.

The criminal background check came up clear but I found out that the male tenant had case against him that caused him to loose his job at the school due to inappropriate behavior.

They write tax code to stimulate behavior.

But when one of the parties is licensed by a governmental board of some sort, the board can subject the licensed individual to higher standards behavior, and they can do this largely at will and without the higher thresholds of most criminal laws.

If you don't ever set boundaries and say NO, they will continue to escalate the behavior. 

I am not tolerating this behavior and am going to Non-Renew and then if necessary evict.

I only know about the times where this was found out prior to closing, obviously I have no way to know about the times this shady behavior wasn't found out.Since you get a vote in who this tenant is, and it's retail, PSA that commercial lenders (especially the ones offering the best terms...) are starting to vet deals by how 'recession proof' the tenants are, even if they are currently paying on time.

But until someone provides evidence (via their primary research like I did) that central NC, with 1M in population is completely different from everywhere else as far as SDIRA investment behavior, I will assume the above is consistent with the rest of the country.

Increase the rent more than usual,   just don't link it to the tenants behavior.   

@Yaakov S. doubt these tenants have high credit scores, so you're probably dealing with Class C tenants with under 620 FICO scores.THIS IS NORMAL BEHAVIOR FOR THEM!