The income for the house is basically the combination of the 3 persons together.. so separately they might not qualify,, but together their monthly income is over the 2 or 3 times the monthly rent per month.. whatever you had set for that.Any one under age of 18 is listed as ...

There is a lot of good advice in this thread and I pretty much do a combination of what everyone has said.

Desmond Alexander I haven't heard of FHA zero down but it sounds like some are advertising similar things in CA. http://www.desertsun.com/story/money/real-estate/2017/09/08/get-house-no-down-payment-one-desert-lender-says-its-possible/594674001/Basically they are combining FHA with those local downpayment assistance grants .I think those grants are usually for first time home buyers.Personally I don't know if people have zero down and no money getting into a house is a good idea .

If you are looking out of state, you could probably acquire two properties that combined could cash flow much better ($700-900/month). 

If so the problem could range from unknown deferred maintenance on the property to unfavorable language in the lease; if it has not been UC in the 12 months its been listed its likely because of any of the above issues or a combination thereof.

Maybe it was just a combination of the two.  

Last year with HA combined their revenue was $166M growing at 30% a year.

Just use the body and buy a new one once it craps out.I dunno, that's how I feel about it.  

Again, a tough combination to have.  

There's been a large change in the fact that many new businesses are catering to the young adult crowd; this combined with the low cost of living is bringing new young people to the city.