No method is inherently better than any other (adverse possession still fascinates me though), it's only that different geographic areas sometimes cater to one method over another.

Fascinating that they are talking about the need to hire many more IRS agents in order to insure that individuals and businesses are purchasing health insurance or paying the penalties involved.As government grows and social programs grow and a large segment of the population retires those left that work or provide jobs will be footing a huge bill.

As Jon said, it's not rocket science to change one out, but it's not a pretty job either.

The National Academy of Sciences found that the net fiscal drain on American taxpayers is between $166 and $226 a year per native household.

And while I don't read it, I have a several friends who claim the Christian Science Monitor (the news sections, not the religious sections) tend to be very centrist.

Identifying the business aspects of any project, zoning modifications, meeting with city planners and adopting a concept for the project is not rocket science, neither is the glossy presentations since there are many specialists that can accomplish the same thing.

Review the inputs (it's not rocket science) and check for accuracy.The software used is likely from Marshall & Swift/Boeckh.

Selling a house is not rocket science, but few investors have all the skills necessary to do as good a job as a good agent.

This ain't rocket science!

It is much more profitable for people to start their own business or take courses of action that discourage hard sciences and such.