So true!

Forget the hate that'll come this way for that comment-- it's true. 

Is this true?

So true. 

Completely true, couldn’t agree more.

They argue that their renovation is top notch, so the price is justified, which may or may not be true, but but generally the high quality of the renovation does not pay sufficient dividends in the form of increased rent, so the price to rent ratio just isn't there.They typically advertise a 9% to 13% cash on cash return, but be careful, this is their "first year projection" and in their first year they do some things that I find a it deceptive, such as not accounting for vacancy because they place a tenant prior to closing, and they budget essentially nothing for repairs or cap ex since it is renovated and they offer a warranty. 

Regarding anonymity, a good attorney or true stalker, will be able to find you regardles of what you do. 

So similar to golden era of active RE having possibly passed due to higher interest rates, I fear it may also be true for syndications (I am in one syndication that I fear an equity loss which would be my first time if this comes to pass).  

Income is $600,000 per year and husband and wife both work full-time non real estate jobs.Is it true that the tax benefits are greater, or realized more quickly, on purchases like furniture or televisions to itemize a rental property, when they are made AFTER the date the property is put in service?

While it is true this would help folks “unlock” some of the equity in their home since home prices/values have appreciated greatly in the last 3-4 years, it also means they will spend it somewhere into the economy and that means more pressure on inflation.