Starker (and his attornies) acted for himself - Now you have to use an unrelated 3rd partyStarker took many months to complete his purchases - now you've got 45 to identify and 180 to closeStarker left the money in escrow with the buyer until he identified properties to purchase - now you can't touch or have control over the properties.Starker and his son were involved at different levels with different interminglings - No the tax payer has to be the same from sale to purchase.So you gotta give a shout out to Mr Starker cause he fought the law and this time the law didn't win! 

Issue is do taxpayers know what needs to be done? 

I know we should look for those late on mortgage or tax payments but are there good sites where this information is available?

Qualifying taxpayers can claim a subtraction on their Colorado income tax returns for certain qualifying capital gains included in their federal taxable income.

Get a nice big folder, walk into court with confidence, and do us all the favor of keeping her off the taxpayer dole.

This would be expensive for either the home owner, bank or tax payers.

I think it's a bloviated waste of taxpayer money.

That led to the tax revolt of Proposition 13.In some jurisdictions, as a sop to taxpayers, the local officials reduce their tax rates by a small amount each year, but never enough to offset the big increase in tax collections created by higher assessments.

Hi @Garrett Simmons, It sounds like both LLCs are owned by the same person and are likely both disregarded entities, so the taxpayer would be buying from himself. 

He can stretch out the tax payments by owner financing or, probably more correctly, calling it installment payments.