I claimed for years 1) initial cash flow and cash flow over a long hold have a poor coupling 2) that I would purchase a property with negative initial cash flow.  3) I cared about total return and did not give a $hit about cash flow if the other returns produce an outstanding return 4) that cash flow is my least favorite return because it gets taxed annually. 

Fixing a class B doesn't produce amenities that Class A offers, otherwise you're losing sq ft if you add a gym/shower, etc.Anyway, happy to get updates, but I think your leasing will be at 0 for 12 months.

Jeff Sitti - I would buy a performing note that produces 12% returns so he could get approximately $1,000 per month in immediate cash flow.

Tying up a distressed sellers property then not producing any results for them can lead to the property being foreclosed on and the seller being seriously hurt financially. 

It was fully renovated when I bought it.I added value by adding income-producing rooms.What was the outcome?

A home inspection produced 50 issues that needed attention.

There are likely at least subtle differences between those proposals.In terms of good and bad experiences, you won't find an insurance company that doesn't produce happy and unhappy customers.  

Which markets (Cities, States, Counties) are producing the highest cash flow while keeping purchase prices under 100K?

However, 1) there are still syndicators producing outstanding returns 2) commercial MF and office space is down significantly.  

If you expect a large tax balance this is why people rush to get it into services ASAPEdit: To also add if the taxpayer qualifies for the "STR loophole" as some call it, even if they don't have much rental income, they could use the losses produced by that STR to offset other income.