The other info sounds great but I would verify the assumptions I mentioned because if they’re off, it throws everything else off.  

Additionally, the price point is still cheap enough to find the 1% rule and positive cash flow and it's super landlord friendly.

Not trying to throw anyone under the bus and I respect both of you for doing what your doing and you guys probably do a great job.

It can throw people off.

It's probably to much information to throw out right now and would be off topic of the post.Would still like to chat about it if you have the time. 

so, you're maxing out debt service which makes it tougher to cash flow.with that said, no matter the purchase strategy, you should always make sure you're using actual numbers, and not random assumptions.for example - some people will throw out '10% for capex.' 

Instead of evicting them, i was thinking is there some way that I could rent it back to him for very cheap (mainly to cover just the taxes/ insurance) ie 2k a year rather than the going rate of 2k a month for similar properties.

So the only foul I see here is you throwing pot shots at this company when your issue isn't even really related to them at all.

I’m open to flipping, renting, or exploring other strategies.My mantra is to test new things “fast and cheap,” so I’ll probably begin investing locally in CT before considering otehr markets across the US. 

However, you should be fine with their analysis.Don’t cheap out with free or $1500 reports.