14 June 2024 | 15 replies
Or just buy a TBill on Treasury Direct and call it a day.
3 September 2019 | 278 replies
Eventually our treasuries and bonds will not be able to be sold to central banks.
15 June 2024 | 87 replies
Treasury Department and more, knowing about and looking the other way regarding the 2nd "borrower".
19 November 2023 | 19 replies
I am interested in Colorado tax liens and have been reading through title 39 and noticed the section that allows for a person with a disability to contest a deed issued by the treasury for up to 9 years after the date the deed was issued.
20 February 2007 | 4 replies
There is actually a specific example in Section 1.1031 of the Treasury Regulations that details this.
30 March 2022 | 4 replies
I'm a bit confused as some lenders incorporate prime, others use 1-year treasury and others are offering a fixed rate...This will be my first HELOC.
23 October 2013 | 19 replies
There are many reasons to insure your property cash flows as you are taking on a much bigger risk than, say, 30-year treasuries, so why risk little or no return until hopefully the tenants pay down the mortgage for you?
9 August 2024 | 184 replies
Treasury that would allow federally chartered banks to move onto their turf."
15 January 2018 | 8 replies
@Natalie Kolodij and @Jake Hottenrott, the issue here is that if a property's average period of customer use is 7 days or less (as many if not most Airbnbs are though I'm not sure about @Sara Erickson's case), it's not considered a rental activity under Reg §1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii)(A) and therefore would not be depreciated under 27.5 years, which is reserved for residential rental property under §168.That being said, the scope of Reg §1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii) limits the scope of Reg §1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii)(A) to the 7-day-or-less rule to Reg §1.469-1T(e)(3), not §168 and not the entire IRC.And of course the regs for the 7-day-or-less rule are temporary regs issued in 2002, and the shelf life on temporary regs is 3 years.But nevertheless these regs probably give some insight into Treasury's thought process here.Speaking of which...Airbnb wasn't a thing in 2002, and Treasury's presumption back then may have been that the "rental" of a property with an average period of customer use of 7 days or less would likely have been bundled with some significant services, thus making the entire activity a trade or business rather than a rental.But things are different now, though obviously some services are provided with the typical Airbnb (e.g., the provision of clean sheets, television, complimentary snacks, etc.) that aren't provided in the typical rental...What do I do?