If the money-transfer service deposits $0.20 and $0.17, the account holder might only see a single deposit of $0.37, so when the service asks "how much did we deposit?"

They do not own the property, they are the first lien holder.  

At minimum, subsection (c) of this rule requires an advertisement placed by a license holder must "clearly and conspicuously contain the name of the broker, either a business entity or an individual."

why wouldn't the other 2 share holders just buy out the guy??

@Jackson Holder Interesting.  

you can give him the 1st lien holder position like a mortgage.

Here's the story as it pertains to a friend of mine.He moved into a home, with a lease to own option.He put a significant amount of money down on the home.The current mortage holder, who does not live in the home, leases the home to my friend.The current mortgage holder does not pay the mortgage on time.The home is in foreclosure now, 30 days from the final "date" pf foreclosure, when the occupants are given 20-60 days to vacate the premise.Some investors want to buy the home from my friend for 165K and sell it back for 220K.

For holds, the interest rate going up, causing the prices to come down, actually works in the holder's favor.1 - Lower purchase price means higher profits when house goes back up again...and it will.  

The property I am interest in is the1915 Fry loop, Its arv is around 300k, I did the deed search and going through the mortgages and assignments Ive come to the conclusion that it has 2 lien holders.

I typically see the bank set the bid for the amount owed to them as the first lein holder.