They have sufferred no loss, and no harm.

The New Zealand government did a study and found that there is basically no harmful effects from any residue left behind after use:  https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/104287037/rental-meth-panic-over 

Originally we though we'd live in the condo 2 years and then the multifamily 2 years, but it'd be nice if the primary residence designation is easily changeable....if the multifamily does not close, then we would have the condo as our primary residence. not sure if that important of an issue...4) The contract that has disclosures about lead and radon...we live in New Jersey, so for renting we sign disclosures about lead, since all the houses here are old and anything prior to 70's will have lead, so in the contract when they have radon....lead....naturally occurring substances in New Jersey, is this standard in the contract? 

Great work Ty, there's no harm in asking.

Without a robust emergency rental assistance program, this moratorium will ultimately harm the very people it aims to help as it will be impossible for housing providers to meet their financial obligations and continue to provide shelter to their residents.Cheers, Yuriy 

I don't see any harm to show proof of funds

He doesn't want any bad feelings from a deal gone wrong to harm our relationship - which I think makes sense. 

Hi Zach,From what I understand, asbestos containing materials are not harmful unless they are removed. 

No harm in asking. 

Some of them may cause harm, depending on the whole health situation.