
6 July 2014 | 1 reply
The reason why usually two years of consistency is needed with these numbers is because statistically one year just doesn't seem to be provide enough stability.

1 December 2015 | 79 replies
Identifying tells, understanding statistics, representing strength or weakness, considering your position/table image and maintaining discipline are all more important.

12 July 2014 | 9 replies
Not that it can't be done, but statistically, you would have to buy a lot of good liens to end up owning a house.

21 January 2016 | 11 replies
@Bob EstlerThe statistical probability of someone getting hurt due to a sinkhole is astronomically low.

7 August 2014 | 14 replies
The reason is they know statistically buildings of a certain age the plumbing goes bad, wiring, roofs, all kinds of things etc.

27 July 2014 | 5 replies
There are rules of thumb, statistical averages, historical trends, preferences, wild *** guesses and 'ooh my gosh, I can't believe this worked' (i.e. sometimes you just get lucky).There are literally thousands of threads / posts discussing how to value property and you will see terms such as: "50% rule", "2% rule", "1% rule", "$100 per door" and others.To explain very simply; these are not rules in the standard sense in that they always work (if it was that easy, everyone could do it).

24 July 2014 | 5 replies
If it's purely an investment statistically when things go wrong owners can walk away versus where they sleep at night.

25 July 2014 | 5 replies
The lack of that amount of data will have an effect on the accuracy of your statistical results.

11 August 2014 | 7 replies
Hi,I am looking for a reliable website/resource for rental statistics.