Just part of human nature (in my opinion)...My suggestion is to try to deal with people on their level -- if they seem disingenuous and shady, demand strong contracts/agreements and never giver leeway.

The amount of instruction to follow each path of alternatives would be enormous, it's amazing what the human brain can store when you think about it.

One of the tenants moved out ("the best one"), and a new guy moved in who was "a little shady".Long story short, the newest tenant was a drug dealer who was under surveillance by the police.

Here the landlord law has special provisions for this scenario ... they carry with them a {minimum} 60-day close to allow the tenant enough time to move.I more human way of handling it, is to work with the chosen tenant and Vendor to find a new home for this tenant and help them move {again: at the Vendor's expense if at all possible}.

After that, I moved to Champaign to attend UIUC's Masters of Human Resources and Industrial Relations program.I love ATV sports, travel, especially international, music, and learning new things.

I'm new to this "game" and absorbing as much information as a human sponge can.

This really leads sellers to lean that direction, not only is this route unethical (like most may think, who cares) you can be operating illegally, tortuous conduct.I believe most investors (operators/dealers) don't understand RE, many enter residential RE looking at the money and nothing else.

The owner might accept it or they will counter.While investors and operators often see themselves as wheeler-dealers, killer negotiators that offer almost nothing, skip over the usual and customary as if they have special skills in getting homerun deals, that is probably only the case in their mind.

Upfront payments is usually the MO of drug dealers and those who don't want to comply with the other rules of your lease.The hardest evictions are for items not related to rent payment, ask any eviction attorney.

He probably thought I was a drug dealer.