In the letter, emphasize the benefit they would receive by selling their house to you (save their credit, no more payments etc.)

My friend and I want to buy a home. we are first time home buyer, and we had a lender run our credits and said we were good to go, and that he would be able to help us get 100% financing with first time home buyer programs.Now my lender said there no more 100% financing(occupied loan) out there even with first time home buyer programs.So we need a lender that can help us with first time home buyer program at 100% financing. thanks

no more growth after they have rubbed head to toe with an agent for non-re-growth

Another way of saying it is: if you reckon it'll conservatively appraise for say $100k, you need to have spent no more than $70k on it. ($70k x 143% = $100k).It shouldn't matter if $50k of that $70k was already borrowed money - the Refi pays it out and you still get back your original $20k deposit.

They deal with sales debts and charge no more than 10% as far as I know.

The old toilet used to clog sometimes, and I got tired of wasting repeated $75 service charges, so I spent $100 to put in a new toilet, and no more clogs.Things don't break as much as you might think.

I figured they must have spent $85,000 on the house and put at least another $30,000 into the renovation before realizing they only purchased a lot worth no more than $10,000.

Never allow the visitor to stay more than the number of days that your state would consider residency.For the state I invest in that is 14 days, so I generally limit them to 7 consecutive days no more that twice a year without written notice and a background check on the visitor. 

That being said, $10K could be in the ball park when you add it all together for the average eviction - but I typically don't reach that figure personally.Wouldn't it be great if we could streamline the process down to have a court decision within no more than 30 days from the 5 day notice and have the option to privatize the sheriff's job of removing the tenant if they don't leave?

In the future, I recommend no more than one verbal warning, then a written warning with a clear description of the penalty for failing to comply, then penalize or evict.