
23 June 2016 | 1 reply
Again only a local attorney can interpret your state law.

1 July 2016 | 8 replies
I interpreted "refusing to let me see..." as the work was done but we don't have to show you.

3 July 2016 | 13 replies
When I read the article, I interpret that he's speaking solely from the primary home owner standpoint, and not necessarily from an investor standpoint.

5 July 2016 | 12 replies
Your description of your intent to hold it as a rental could certainly be interpreted that way.

1 August 2016 | 10 replies
At any rate, you being the new owner would be responsible and I would interpret that yes, you can hire your own vendor to perform the work.

12 January 2018 | 27 replies
But please, if you haven't raised a lot of money before and don't have a track record, don't interpret this to mean that raising money is as simple as doing a webinar and having the commitments flow in.

27 June 2016 | 16 replies
If not perhaps someone could let us know who to contact to interpret the report- would a real estate attorney be best?

27 June 2016 | 9 replies
I think there is a whole forum on here for that topic.And as far as Dodd Frank interpretation goes... ask 20 people, get ready for 20 diff answers.

9 July 2016 | 4 replies
Do I interpret that differently for multi-family properties than SFP?

19 July 2016 | 3 replies
Hi All,I am a owner/seller looking for an interpretation of the term "Builder" under Dodd-Frank in the one transaction per 12 months exclusion for seller financing without a Mortgage Loan Originator.