If you had refinanced it after it had 33%, you could have extracted all of you initial investment at 75% LTV and been on infinite return.  

I use a variation on Buffett's strategy to avoid paying any meaningful tax on my stock portfolio.1) I invest primarily in high growth stocks and ETFs so currently taxable dividends are minimized.2) I only invest in securities I intend to hold indefinitely so currently taxable capital gains are minimized.

Otherwise, these gains are on their typical 180 day clock.‍Note on 1031 Exchanges - Investors can sell an existing property, put any portion of their capital gains into an OZ Fund, and extract the principal.

been with evolve for 2 years now.. there are pros and cons... make sure you are extracting their full worth by having them contact a strong on the ground support.  

Some items:The higher rent appreciating market will always eventually have superior cash flow as long as rent appreciation exceeds expense inflation (excluding extraction of value which is in reality what most investors do).  

If the ADU results in a negative position, there is no easy method to extract out the investment potentially trapping the investment for years (until appreciation and equity pay down result in a value 33% higher than costs (using 75% LTV refi)). 

House prices have been going up in several places and investors can't really get in to earn meaningful returns.

I've also considered a number of variations, including using a modified BRRRR strategy to extract cash and do the next one.

Nevermind the restart of the clock on paying down meaningful principal, which is also a major downside. 

However, often missed is that Cost Seg has its own costs and is primarily only a timing benefit, a benefit that can be meaningful for some, but again not necessarily all.