
10 April 2018 | 10 replies
Investors with 10 or more have a business so they treat it differently and are more profitable as a result of some focus.

10 May 2018 | 39 replies
Mostly, it'll be the latter.Banks really do treat their customers like sheep - to be dutifully herded at will!

27 May 2018 | 18 replies
@Andrew Dodds, the way I read what Amber and Chris wrote, you could treat your $181k remaining VA entitlement as if it was a HELOC (like having existing equity), which should more than cover the required deposit that you might need for your next $500k home.Of course, your Non-VA Lender will go through your Debt-To-Income Ratio with a fine tooth comb, so depending on how much Rent they allow you to allocate towards your income, you could be good to go!

11 April 2018 | 4 replies
@Steve Podwojski Going from a multi-member LLC to a single-member LLC does not spark an audit in and of itself as long as you treat it for tax purposes within the framework of Revenue Ruling 99-6, which is the IRS' guidance for this very situation.Are you buying out the other members for cash?

14 April 2018 | 9 replies
The industry term for this is “dealer property” there is a great deal of case law on the issue as to what you should be considering in performing this analysis.If the property is treated as inventory, the gain is ordinary income, not capital gain.A conservative approach is to hold the property 2-years post completion to treat it as a capital asset.You should speak to your tax advisor on this issue as it is a complex analysis.

11 April 2018 | 3 replies
Or is "taxable compensation" as well as the "treat of loosing one's license" the crux of the matter, here?!

13 April 2018 | 8 replies
@Joe Edwards-Hoff As was mentioned, when it comes to so many units, you need to treat it as a business and analyze it appropriately.
14 April 2018 | 0 replies
He treated the affected unit multiple times and also treated the surrounding units.

15 April 2018 | 4 replies
Essentially they charge for the water that was lost, but not the corresponding sewage treatment cost since they didn’t treat the leaked water as sewage.

15 April 2018 | 2 replies
Will the remaining shareholders be treated as a minority owner of building or just simple as another pool of tenants?