I imagine a single transfer of the full amount will raise eyebrows.  

Even though the lenders may be aware that the loan is being taken over subto, given the back and fourth communication with a third party authorization form and change of insurance, it is best not to raise any eyebrows. 

Anyone who promotes something you cannot provide should raise eyebrows (guarantee).

Though it's not a definite show-stopper for a property to be tossed around like a hot potato and have a bunch of transfers like this, it usually causes me to raise an eyebrow and be at least somewhat suspicious.

Kudos and thanks to everyone that replied and a special thanks to @Robert Norvell and @Thomas Morris for raising eyebrows on ways to further this discussion and create a platform for everyone questioning this topic.There were between 15 and twenty replies and going from them I would vote Indiana being the most friendliest with New Jersey coming in last (out of the friendlies).

Given that it will be built on your primary residence will raise some eye brows if you are looking for investor financing. 

I must admit, the figures are making me raise an eyebrow, and I'm curious to hear from others who might have insights or experience in this area.It feels a bit high to me, but I don't have much to compare it to.Can anyone shed light on whether this is a reasonable expense?

Dan Ok so I realize my response is going to raise A LOT of eyebrows ( most of my comments do LOL ) but here goes, 100000% waste of time!!!

Either way I’ll go for it and submit the requested info but not without raising an eyebrow that the underwriting is encroaching on differential treatment..

The only thing that raises an eyebrow, looking at it, are the conditions under which the firm gets a commission.