It will depend on the association's bylaws and master deed.There was a recent case on this and that is how the supreme court ruled. 

Do some research on this, there was a 2010 Supreme Court ruling that changed some of these laws that you should be able to find very easily via Google.The bottom line is that snow removal, like all other expenses, should be budgeted for.

http://portlandtribune.com/sl/345184-224009-shipping-containers-get-new-lifeThis is my long time colleague  we have developed quite a few subdivisions together.. shared a few airplanes as well.. great guy... he is really into these container houses.He has a 40 acre tract where he hopes to build a few hundred of them and put them on long term leases akin to a MHP.... he will retain the land sell the box.Great guy.. and supremely proud to call him my friend  

There's a US Supreme Court decision that supports lifting the stay. 

Since you have already sunk the money on these ones, I would suggest keeping them supremely well maintained, and ensuring you get the full lifespan out of them. 

If that's the supreme goal -- to 'steal a deal' -- then you're absolutely correct. 

In September 1961, the case went to the Supreme Court of Washington (O'Meara v.

I doubt they will actually pass communist healthcare and have it survive a Supreme Court challenge. 

Also, mere arrest can no longer be considered in a background check.While disparate impact was important in the low income housing tax credits case that gained Supreme Court recognition for the concept, it was not a Fair Housing or a zoning context.  

The State Supreme Court just ruled again on this ridiculous rule.