Quote from @Scott Scialabba: Quote from @Corby Goade: Lots of things to consider here; generally speaking, the higher the ROI, they less desirable the properties are.

However, those few who are financially saavy and have integrity and grit I believe will benefit from it until they are able to have enough experience to go off and do their own thing, charge less fees and be able to have more repeat business while keeping a much higher ROI themselves.And NO, i've never been in this program, been around much longer than he even thought of this revenue stream. 

I "could" make higher returns on my equity if I borrowed, but it also increases the risk.  

It’s possible I could get closer to $4,000 in LTR rent but a real estate agent ran comps and reported it might be a stretch / bring higher DOM.

Potentially Higher Returns: Real estate often yields higher returns.Cons1.

So, suppose you refinance the property after remodeling, and it appraises for a higher value.

So, if data is only from the spring and summer then interpolated over the year, it will be way off.Also, there are some areas on the other side of the lake which are WAY nicer and can ask higher dollars. 

@Caryn Seifert agree with @Jonathan Greene about $500 being too high.Perhaps give prospects a choice of higher Pet Fee or higher monthly Pet Rent?

Although one property will have negative cash flow, the ability to reinvest could yield higher returns across the portfolio.

In general you want to be above the mid price point to avoid the lower tier tenants that require more effort, have higher delinquency rates, higher eviction rates, and often higher tenant flip costs.