I would say it is perfect up to a B+ property. 

But here's a few sites you can go to where you can do more research and get some more info:https://cal-rha.org/legislative/ab-1482/https://a17.asmdc.org/issue/ab-1482-frequently-asked-questionshttps://www.naahq.org/sites/default/files/naa-documents/naa_-_tenant_protection_act_of_2019_ab_1482.pdfBest of luck.

Until you know the market really well, I wouldn't just put a property under contract then attempt at or assume someone will pay more than you got the AB side under contract for until you know the market or know your buyers and what they will pay at minimum.If you want to try and get top dollar, get private funds, but the deal then as soon as you buy it, list it on the MLS. 

If your property is in a "B" neighborhood you probably wouldn't have to do this because you could find tenants that aren't living so close to the edge.

My Michigan property is a B class neighborhood and yes it's on a conventional 30 year loan.

Better areas (A, B C+) usually will produce better tenants that take care of your investment.Not trying to give legal device in any way but just supplying my opinion from my experience.

I have financed multiple MHPs and like that the yields are better than if I invested in a B quality multifamily property. 

In A, B and even C+ neighborhoods you can sell to homeowners at retail.

It's better to find a B asset with better tenants and location hitting your COC with proper debt structure than buying in rougher areas.For 11% COC you don't need to run them.

Just trying to balance properties with better cashflows along with ones in A/B neighborhoods that might not cashflow as well.