Nobody's ever treated me badly.That said, I wouldn't have put Fremont at the #1 spot...unless you're comparing it to places like Oakland and San Francisco.

Correct me if I'm wrong but essentially you are saying to treat it more like a standard contract that closes not "if" but rather "when" the rezoning goes through.

@Dan Heuschele, I noticed you invest in Escondido and this property is in Old Escondido, I love this town and I'd like to treat you to coffee one of these days...

So it is like a car transaction in terms of title.But based on the integrity of the numbers involved it should be treated like a real estate transaction.

Going to send you a private message and maybe lunch or dinner some time my treat and we can drive around your area one day.

Alternatively, an S corporation would treat those expenses as start-up expenditures under IRC Sec. 195.

Some, you have to treat them as if they were your children and just educate them, hold their hand a little bit until they get the process down packed. and if they can't then don't renew their lease/ worst case scenario evict based on failure to follow agreed upon lease/policy of the building.

With this many people and animals in the house it may cost me loads of money.Sorry Im venting a little bit - people like this make me lose more faith in society - I've always been the type to do things on a handshake and a mans/womans word means something - I've treated people with respect and gotten it back - it doesnt appear to be a 2 way street with this guy. 

Tenant complains that is treated unfairly because he has only one spot.

@Tierra Petersen, Commercial operations with multiple hookups are treated differently, but I can tell you from years of experience, so far the county has not enforced RV rules against the rural land owners that I know of who allow someone to live in a single RV on their property.