Ultimately, pricing wins the day, so at a certain price it'll lease.

Here the agenda behind the prohibitive zoning is anti-gentrification which is merely going to result in disinvestment because developers are restricted on design and density and will simply invest elsewhere. https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/philadelphia/latest/ph...

If you saw the issue and chose to close on the property anyway, that’s going to be a tough case to win. 

That's a big win for me because, generally, when you're evicting, the tenant stopped paying rent.

I met the owners during the walkthrough, and ended up hitting off with them, and they wanted me to win the property in a multi-offer situation.

Investment Info:

Retail commercial investment investment.

Purchase price: $125,000

Cash invested: $125,000

A while back, I found myself with an intriguing opportunity: a property priced at $125,000 t...

But it's not simply locating rich people.

That would put you between probably $3500-4500 depending on dp, property taxes etc. 85k salary, let’s say you are taking on home 60k, like even with house hacking, you’d simply at best be extremely house poor, at worst would be challenged to afford the mortgage, the vast majority of people buying homes in our area at this point in the cycle for a variety of reason are dual income households, tbh for a single person making 85k a year, you are just much better off renting or moving to locol area if remote or hybrid.

I suspect Trump/Vance will win the election, and this useless law will disappear.

You might want to do a comparison of simply selling and paying the tax and then investing post tax dollars into whatever equities you want.