Your rate would be above 6%+ with the current DSCR rates and losing the 3.875% rate obviously isn't ideal.

We were to receive an interest rate on par with their “best” customer rate, and 20 year fixed rate financing!   

Very poor customer service.

Selling the property, ideally without the non-paying tenants.2. 

Now LL are stuck with these less than ideal tenants.  

Ideally, you avoid anything more than 2 chains.

That is the customer and who pays, it doesn't matter who owns the home then or now.

These include falsely claiming to have closed dozens of deals when none were ever closed, illegal payment of undisclosed sales commissions to bundlers and independent contractors, advertising the funds as safe and appropriate to investors with obvious near-term needs for their capital, creating fund of funds en masse assembly line fashion with no corresponding SEC filings, unregistered brokers/financial advisors acting in that capacity absent licensure, having customers wire money claim the fund is fully subscribed and putting them into a high yield promissory note, accepting funds from unaccredited investors, misrepresentations about the debt put on the project, lies about experience level of the principals, omissions of material facts, and at least two straight up Ponzi schemes.While it's true that some legitimate operators are having issues in their portfolios, today's circumstances are a perfect example of the idiom, "you can only discover who is swimming naked when the tide goes out."

In an ideal world, you'll report the sale of the home on your personal tax return and qualify for the exclusion.

Ideally, I would start in Sacramento since I have built some contractor relationships.