Banking already has a pretty negative image in the US…maybe neutral at best…there’s no way that a bank is going to risk its image on a loan that already makes them TONS of money.

I am posting neutral thoughts based on my 40+ years in the real estate game.

Dustin, I have 12-doors in Detroit and 3 of those are Section 8 rentals.I'm overall neutral on the program.

What if you bought the second property with a loan such that it was also cashflow-neutral?

-A property with a 30 year mortgage would be neutral cash flowing, but in a solid location and with strong demand. 

But if miraculously it was neutral or positive $100/mo, it's a no brainer you keep it?

A so-so deal that is cash-flow neutral will often become cash-flow positive over time.

This deduction can offset the income generated by the property, potentially reducing it to a tax-neutral position.For those with full-time jobs, the challenge lies in the IRS designation of "real estate professional," which has specific hour requirements that must be met to take full advantage of these deductions against ordinary income.

I'd buy as many LTRs or STRs as I could in growing, landlord friendly areas, putting 20% down on properties that I liked that would be cash flow neutral or better on year one.

You can you passive losses to neutralize/eliminate passive income.