Here's a video where the founder talks about liquidity: https://youtu.be/ChORxCEyVqc

In regards to capital I have options: FHA, private lender, tradiational, and I'm moderately liquid.

Something to keep in mind is that if you have 50k liquid for your next property, you really have 35k to use for a downpayment and closing costs.

The customer signs our contract , we get 1 /3 down .Now people tend to thing thats for materials , thats partially right , First it secures you a time frame , if you cancel we keep the deposit as liquidated damages .

It really depends on the markets you are looking in, if you have the bandwidth to handle general contractors and their subs, and the amount of capital/liquid you have.

First of all, congratulations on having the liquidity - it's a great problem to have.

If you’re really set on building a portfolio, this might be a good way to go since it’ll give you the liquidity to take on more properties.BRRRR: If you’re leaning towards long-term rental income and portfolio growth, the BRRRR method could be an attractive option, but you’re right to consider the numbers carefully.

Who do they reach out to FIRST (realtor, estate liquidators, or )?

So I’m pretty close to you, once I pull some cash I have sitting in a flip that will probably turn into a brrr I’ll be about 70/30 stocks, I really don’t mind buying property provided I think for some subjective reason that area is undervalued/will outperform the market, but to me the stock market has a few advantages, 1. it is much easier obviously/more liquid. 2.

The purchase price, construction/labor costs, and ARV are all higher here in California than most states so I already have a high tolerance for risk and have the necessary liquidity to scale.