data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a6a/c0a6a74b1012c70ab694d042189f62544ec2a128" alt=""
21 February 2025 | 245 replies
This does not mean it will turn out good or bad, there have been offerings that ended badly and those that did not have any enforcement (boxabl is a recent example as they were under review and had no enforcements against them).Time will tell.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f078a/f078a496c62fa5826efd952b7330987fd521a73f" alt=""
27 December 2024 | 8 replies
Yes it is new legislation that passed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edf89/edf8960009c3d408f3402304dfe6b60a85724274" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 34 replies
in order for the few who created the scheme to risk prison, and forfeiture of their resources, just to become even more wealthy... they had to know that there was not going to be any enforcement action taken regarding their criminal actions, or they would never have taken the considerable risks involved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f77b6/f77b6c101621fc340db65bfbc9f1ee2e98b6e8be" alt=""
27 December 2024 | 4 replies
Quote from @Abhijit Roy choudhury: Financial Crime enforcement Network, requires reporting of Beneficial Ownership Information filing by 01/01/2025.Does this apply to us, Rental LLC owners.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f6e/e3f6ed8ebbd2a22d8bf3c82110694ba41f7f47a4" alt=""
26 December 2024 | 21 replies
The official answer: The Corporate Transparency Act is intended to provide law enforcement with beneficial ownership information for the purpose of detecting, preventing and punishing terrorism, money laundering and other misconduct through business entities.Uncle Sugar requires us little guys to register and be tracked even though 99.999% of us are not involved in terrorism, money laundering, or other misconduct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86d2f/86d2f17e006b4fb8a7d1b825302a091556f90aea" alt=""
2 January 2025 | 10 replies
There is an implied covenant of "quiet enjoyment" by law that can be enforced.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a72d6/a72d6da4c0db740a3b4417cd2a189e2e798b42b6" alt=""
26 December 2024 | 11 replies
I think the problem is this...Legislation and government is making it too difficult to be a landlord.
3 January 2025 | 8 replies
If they are VERY professional, they will have their processes in writing as verification that policies are enforced equally and fairly by their entire staff.6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b26a0/b26a0c8e7674de82f88384b47fe39e0d1860602a" alt=""
5 January 2025 | 17 replies
@James Wise it was always illegal, it's the DAs refusal to prosecute and the LE refusal to enforce is what brough this retail apocalypse on CA cities...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64e56/64e5601bfdb792608881e7d6c00544e5284df14b" alt=""
2 January 2025 | 18 replies
If your leasing application process is thorough and well thought out, and if your lease agreement has been well drafted by your local attorney and if it includes clauses that permit you/your property manager enough latitude to maneuver and anticipate undesirable tenant behaviors, both actions and inactions, and you have operational processes which align with enforcement of your lease, then you've done all you can do to reduce this inherent risk of an undesirable tenant.