I have loss GOOD TENANTS because they shared a porch with people they did not care for.  

It seems I am lossing money.:( Is that right? 

You will have to gather more accurate operating costs (vacancy loss, taxes, utilities, insurance, mgmt fees, maintenance, HOA) to best determine potential future performance.

It's very easy to make one tiny, minor assumption to fill in an unknown that completely changes the context and consequently the answer - I've caught myself doing this a few times.As far as the legal responsibility for the debt goes with Subject To, my guess would be that the contract basically provides a pathway for the seller to pursue the buyer for recourse related to losses they suffer from the default of the original loan, like a form of indemnification, but does not absolve the seller of responsibility for the debt.

Lending and insurance are based on predictability and without question the frequency and size of losses will continue to eclipse prior records.

Jobs will be revised in 2024 to show a net loss in jobs.2.

Sell at a slight loss.

There are several things to fear money loss on a bad investment, government involvement in RE, bad tenants that cost time and money, hidden maintenance issues and/or land issues and the list can go on.Today, I don't fear money loss or tenants,  the big unknown is how much the government wants to get involved in either taxes or landlord/tenant issues.

Understanding the market enables you to spot good bargains and steer clear of potential loss-making regions.

I saw this as a way to avoid a potential month loss rent due to tenant vacancy.