Rent control has held up in the supreme court, under the logic it is for the public good and doesn't give preference to one owner over another.

I was happy with my lender Don McLelland from Supreme Lending; and happy so far with my insurance agent Donna McLellandWould not recommend the realtor (not enough attention to detail) or my inspector (missed the fact that the roof was leaking in the garage)

I think it would end up at the Supreme Court and lose there. 

On Friday, May 8, the Arkansas Supreme Court announced that "beginning May 18, 2020, Arkansas courts in all divisions shall resume conducting hearings with certain measures to combat the spread of the disease to the public . . . ." 

If you file a new case in Arkansas between now and July 25, 2020 seeking an eviction, you "are required to affirmatively plead that the property that is the subject of the eviction dispute is not a covered dwelling un...

These changes all stem from a lawsuit sitting at the PA Supreme Court about how funding tied to the school district properties is not fair for depressed areas and violates the PA Constitution's edict on education availability.Articles:https://dornish.net/is-pennsylvania-ready-in-2018-to-end-most-property-tax-for-funding-public-schools/https://dornish.net/is-pennsylvania-ready-to-end-most-property-tax-for-funding-public-schools/

I ended up in Supreme court this morning on a Landlord tenant issue, and the defendants attorney didn't know anything about the Virginia Residential Landlord tenant act, and it was just sad!!!!!  

I know this because we just locked up 2,500 SFR's in FL (in Orlando, to be specific) that are past the redemption period (bank did not pay delinquent HOA dues), and the same law group that won the case in Nevada in front of the Supreme Court (see link below) is currently handling the conversion into Warranty Deeds.

@J Scott OK but I would challenge that one all the way to the supreme court.that's total BS...

Also know as an acceleration clause.A little history lesson…In the old days when banks loaned money and took back a 30-year mortgage that's exactly what you got.It didn’t matter if you sold the property to someone else that loan stuck with the property for 30 years and could be taken over and paid by anyone.Well, in the early 70's banks, lenders, state governments and other interested parties were so upset that they were getting stuck with low interest rates, missing out on taxes, assumption and other sale fees, that lenders started adding due on sale acceleration clause to their contracts.As you can imagine, a lot of borrowers thought this was unfair and brought suit against banks and lenders.Unfortunately around 1979 the United States Supreme Court found in favor of the banks, and today the due on sale -acceleration clause (usually paragraph 17) is found in most if not all conventional mortgages.For years now buyers and sellers have been trying various ways to get around the problem.