Other times liens, mortgages, and other title issues undisclosed or unknown to the applicant are uncovered in the preliminary title report.

(I understand this may be a flawed logic - but really look at the demographics of who’s moving out).

There are many flaws to this rule, but I use it as a starting point.

Definitely would recommend you do an environmental inspection to uncover stuff like mold, take a look at the roof, and see how old your water heater / furnace are.

A way to network with so many individuals like investors, brokers, inspectors, contractors, appraisers, attorneys etc.But being in self quarantine since february and surfing BP forums I think I have found some flaws in starting with wholesaling.

I am finding many others in tbis same nightmare and they are saying it’s an “as is home”#homepartners and #pathlightpropertymanagement it’s just frustrating they wouldn’t let me be there for the inspection or these issues would have most likely been uncovered!!

So...my question is, why is this an uncommon practice to help people uncover money from their tax foreclosure?

If the county had determined that it couldn't be renovated and lived in, just curious if there any public records of it being condemned that the title company should have uncovered?

The report that people refer too when describing Texarkana crime was critiqued by a professor at UNT and was shown to have flaws.  

-Warren Buffet In my humble opinion, the question starts from a flawed premise.