Ain't that the truth.I have never heard anyone say anything bad about James Wise.. ( well maybe your good friend Clayton).. lol........Well I've never been accused of being overly polite.

.: @Chris JohnSo many people on here ***** about the government getting in their way when it comes to RE.... but when the government actually removes restrictions and it negatively effects them directly.... by blocking their ocean view.... then they want to ***** about that also.Laughing a lot.But that's why it's first world problem LOLSo what's fun about this is both the libs and cons is accusing "rich man" to be behind ADU bills LOLBtw the CA ADU bill is started in 2018/2019.

My point is that if you don't rent to someone who meets your documented criteria, or if you decline one person with a dog but accept a different one, then you are open to being accused of discriminating on the base of race, sex, etc.

We can agree to disagree about something without insulting, calling names and/or accusing people of things that simply aren't true. 

It is nonetheless a recognized legal concept, and a defense to accusation of trespass.

I'm not accusing you or anyone else you're trying to make yourself akin to of anything. 

You commented on my blog article accusing me to be a salesman and not wanting to take the time to sell $30k pigs.  

If you use outside agencies, be sure they are advised in writing to secure their valuables, or the accusations of theft can fly. 

You approach their kids and are accused of tampering with the old folks....I see 2 options: Either get even closer with them - in a genuine way, don't just do it out of greed (IMO) or just go straight business mode and approach them with a generous offer based on them moving when THEY feel ready to move....You stand the risk of irritating someone no matter what you do, but on the other hand, the only way to get a great deal sometimes is to walk out on that limb and jump....

If someone did contest, and accuse the buyer  of using the buyer's attorney as the vehicle of a bad faith termination, then the fact that multiple offers had been made and the buyer "really only wanted Blackacre, the other offers were backstops" then the seller of Whiteacre or Redacre could very well have a cause for breach of contract for bad faith termination.If you really have your heart set on getting Blackacre and your offer for Whiteacre is contingent on NOT getting Blackacre, then you'd better have the contingency in the offer for Whiteacre, and not  put your hopes in the idea that sellers won't challenge your attorney's termination during review.