We get over 3 million visitors a year.

Thus I would say an 80/20 arrangement is probably more suitable.

The difference is that web 2.0 involves participation from visitors.

My local market is not suitable and I’ve looked into other markets without any luck.

We're occasional roller rink visitors.

IMHO, the problem with Realtor.com or ForSaleByOwner.com and the like is you are asked to purchase "space" without a quantification of relavent traffic (who cares if Realtor.com serves of XXXXXXX of visitors per day, week, etc., how much of that traffic is specific to your target market?).

I'm in touch with sources of lines of credit but they suitable for more experienced fix & flip or rental investors.  

I suspected and can now verify tenants used my unit as an illegal pot grow, which explains why there were 10 to 20 visitors every day.

Depending on your financial situation there may be other types of investments that would be more suitable for off shore investors.

Retargeting programs will allow you to follow someone across the internet based on a site they visit or a keyword they type.