But that means you will have inherited the illegal subdivide and may need to cure it one day. 

House-hacking can help, but it's not a cure-all.

You have the most leverage with the current owner right now, before closingPost closing, I would either issue a notice to cure and then ultimately a notice to evict after non-compliance. 

here it's 3 months in which they give original folks the opportunity to cure defaults.

most likely no, since the issue has been resolved. that's why notice of lease violations are typically called notice to cure or vacate, because tenant is given the option of curing the problem or leaving. since there is no longer a dog, he is no longer violating lease, unless your lease has another violation in it you are likely limited to a notice of nonrenewalno legal advice is given.

If he or she does not know why I said what I said in the two sentences ago, you have the wrong CPA.The reason for an LLC is generally liability protection, however this is not a cure all for liability by any means.

More often they are used as a comparison between homes or to generate a "cost to cure" for differences in comparables by a few hundred square feet, garage or finished room etc.Good luck! 

If you're a good landlord with an attractive location you will have endless referrals which can immediately cure the vacancy.

If a tenant is bringing dogs in despite them having signed a "no dogs" agreement, they would have gotten one warning the first time, then a 72 hour notice to cure or quit.Your landlord should not be able to charge a pet fee if that's not in the agreement.

I realize that when there's a normal violation of the lease, a notice of violation is served to the tenant and depending on the type of notice, if that violation isn't cured, a small claims case may be filed for eviction.