For example one big row of 15 units isn't optimal but if I want to break them up I would have to have 20' between blocks, which would kill yield.Instead of waiting for them to modernize their multi-family regs (at least a year out, maybe two) or sucking it up and living with the costs as things stand, I could instead do 5 "triplexes" of single-family + 2 ADUs and bypass some restrictions (only 5' setbacks between blocks, 1 parking space per ADU unit instead of 1.75, etc.).But I'm concerned that Seattle builders may quickly move away from this strategy as HB1110 will (in Seattle and many other larger cities/counties, but not mine) soon enable sixplex townhouses in pretty much all the areas where the condo-ized ADU strategy has been mushrooming. 

In addition, I would point out that the failure of this old PM to live up to their obligations caused you "damage" which they are responsible for.

Akron, like most cities, can change from block to block so parts of some zip codes are no goes for me.

And members crashed them occasionally a couple went into the ponds and some broken feet ( dragging their feet) but to me if you have guest and they let a teen on them with little to no experience if they hit something or someone they could really do some damage so based on my experince with them I would never do this personally.

Pay no attention to the keyboard warriors that took a course from a guru that's really not been around the block.

Now if you have a general person who stops in to do other small tasks or do more property management style tasks (walking through the house to inspect for damages, drop anything off guests may need, change water/HVAC filters etc.)

Also, in some markets, market demand changes from block to block. 

And yes, I will pursue damages to the fullest extent of the law. 

I associate it with 1,000 sf houses on blocks with no garages and an illegal trailer dropped in the backyard.

You cannot garnish wages if you win a judgment for damages.