The “tales” of nothing down/seller subordinates “down payment” done successfully almost always hide the most important information - that the buyer either provided additional collateral (such as real property owned “free and clear”, a certificate of deposit in an amount greater than the down payment required, or the buyer is financially strong enough that part of the financing was in effect a personal loan or line of credit. 

Would we be able to put the home in the Holding LLC since our names are directly on it (albeit a Delaware LLC meant to hide our identities)?

But sometimes the best solution is pushing the problem on someone else (just make sure you are not hiding any skeletons in the closet or under ground and not notifying them). 

I also hope we have a change in the White House and this requirement disappears immediately.It's interesting that this rule was created the rule to prevent companies from hiding criminal activity even though the vast majority of American companies will never engage in criminal activity.

@Sam Faas I don’t hide my name or number.

.@ Travis - Most of the probate properties i come across are owned free and clear but some suprisingly do have mortgages and the administrators never hide that fact but i always ask anyway.

That beard hides his baby face...

I actually prefer that buyer has a home inspection, avoids potential problems where buyer may say that seller was trying to hide something.

(Both that you know about now and that you are told about form your buyer’s inspections.)Most buyers are going to discount their offer by double what they think it will cost to repair what they can see plus the “mystery repairs” you’re hiding with your as-is sale so you will make much less on the sale. 

By showing no pictures, people will assume you are hiding something.