Even with the discount, the investor will be a life style investor who wants to own in PR more than optimize return.  

We still end up doing a few things like upgrading appliances or installing recessed LED lighting and dimmer switches and other life-style upgrades to attract top-notch tenants. 

I’m not suggesting a person change their business model entirely, but usually a person either deletes something or adds something in order for a different outcome or at least a more modified outcome.What’s your thoughts?

These methods include: Detailed Engineering Cost ApproachDetailed Engineering Cost Estimate ApproachSurvey or Letter ApproachResidual Estimation ApproachSampling or Modeling ApproachExperience or “Rule of Thumb” ApproachIt’s important to understand the differences between the approaches including which one best fits your property and the reliability of each approach.DETAILED ENGINEERING COST APPROACHThis approach compiles the costs from construction and accounting reports to build a report.

By spreading the investment horizon across decades, this initiative builds resilience into its model.

If they like to rob houses, they're probably not going to become a model citizen just because they rented your house.

I plan on doing this model also so I would love to follow your journey on this investment and learn what obstacles you may deal with. 

The current commissioner would allow insurers to use computer modeling of future exposure to set premiums, while requiring them to offer coverage in risky communities roughly in line with their shares of the market.  

But if it were the real check why would the company use a hand-written font and then somehow digitally sign it with messy cursive in the same exact ink style as the typed font?

It does sound like we have similar interests (and design styles), so we would love to connect!