For example, did those who "believed in" the rule of law 150 years ago have to agree that slavery was acceptable?

Chair of Sustainability and Renter's committee is socialist whose goal is to abolish private property.

It was a big push about 5-8 years ago and almost every major developer changed the name on your sales drawings because someone thought Master Bedroom had too much connotation with slavery.

Voters vote for representatives who then do what they feel is in the best interest of their constituency (in theory, at least).There are plenty of examples where voters may not have voted for some specific change in law if given the chance, but where our representatives have done it anyway (for example, the general public probably wouldn't have voted to abolish slavery 150 years ago, but our elected officials still passed the 13th Amendment).

@Ian R.So we should just abolish the legal process?

Lastly, they actively support Children's Charities: to end child-slavery, and provide funds for children's medical research and operations.

If they truly want to be a leader, they should abolish rent control, but I digress.  

The law is expected to be abolished or revamped when the next legislative session meets in 2007.Hope this helped.Jim Watkinswww.dfwmentor.com

You would essentially abolish student loans and would need to pay for college with cash which would then continue the divide of the upper and middle class because only wealthy kids could get educated.

From the time the Dems fought President Lincoln on his anti-slavery stance, Dems are the ones who want to keep the minorities 'down.'