I would bet the older homes will see a lot more appreciation than the newer homes, percentage wise. 

LTRs with long term conventional financing and standard management aren't really cash flowing anywhere right now. sure, there are lower cost markets that look better on paper, but there are costs associated with those supposedly cheap markets as well - deferred maintenance, more challenging tenant base, higher cost turnovers as a percentage of the rent.2. i wouldn't pick a random market thousands of miles away based solely on statistics or numbers. 

What percentage of your loans would you estimate for the transactional funding to occur on the same day, at the same title company, where end buyer's funds are in escrow?

These %percentages are market dependant.  

I believe some do own a 2nd place near Los Angeles but a fairly small percentage.  

- The same can be said of high percentage increases.

With the new commission rules you can stay flexible with an offer of buyer agent commission, rather than having to commit to a certain percentage going to the buyer agent upfront. 

It even states that the lease “will repeat itself” but doesn’t specify terms like figures or percentages for rent increases.

Riskier assets are lower percentages.

They were fine with my score (about 740), but have issue with the percentage of personal credit I am utilizing, so that discussion also petered out.Apparently, I have a lending profile right now, that is not attractive to mainstream lending programs.Any advice?